Raw LLM Responses

So it's ok to break laws that we think are a nuisance? I mean, I'm one of the masses that drives a little too fast and jaywalks now and then, but I can't fool myself into thinking that it's not against the law because "everyone" does it. I do know that I don't push yellow\-red lights like I used to before red light cameras became common at intersections. I'm not for data retention connected to similar systems, but I'm also not buying into the argument that speed\-trap cameras are the top of a slippery slope leading to everyone getting charged as a repeat\-offending scofflaw. People would just adjust, and stop casually breaking laws. And laws would change to fit how people \(reasonably\) behave. Also, due process and the police are still a thing. Police still have to look at evidence, DAs still have to file charges, and you still have a right to your day in court. Even with automated speeding cameras, you can choose to seek mercy or real justice. So, yeah, I think the focus should be on data retention. i.e. It's one thing to look at/process data involved in the commission of a crime, it's another to build dossiers on people that are not breaking any laws. That's Google's/Facebook's job.