Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Thank you for sharing your insight. It's fascinating to consider how our actions…
ytr_UgwT6aEOf…
G
It's a trick question. The first clip is AI. The second clip is done with non-AI…
ytc_UgyiftaTf…
G
Well, especially when the pin above is saying if you are effecient in AI they ar…
ytr_Ugyk32AFQ…
G
one of the good things about AI is it will show us how limited our minds are and…
ytc_UgxX7dSNA…
G
Sometimes a solution does not need to be as complicated as it seems. Just have l…
ytc_Ugxm_1X1k…
G
Bro thinks he’s talking to a programmed person while he’s just talking to an adv…
ytc_UgxlQkkhl…
G
Never say never when speaking of ai. You simply can't phantom how it will be in …
ytr_UgwDtKzpM…
G
OK. Show me how? Here's what I have been doing in the mean time. I create my …
ytc_UgwKrmSxt…
Comment
For the facial recognition it’d go to a central location to verify first, but I get to verify the plates. I just mark it incorrect and keep driving.
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1527004278.0
♥ 14
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_dze18nk","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_dzer3rp","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_dzedenj","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_dzelmip","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"rdc_dze4dp8","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]