Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
> What additional capability do you gain fron allowing korea and japan to develop nuclear weapons? Well, if NK can hit the US with a nuclear weapon, then can the US really be depended upon to hit back at NK if NK fucks with SK, knowing that it may mean that DC or NYC is leveled? Thus, there's a game theory angle where you want to give SK the *independent* ability to launch nukes to retaliate against NK, so NK never thinks it can fuck with SK under cover of its own nuclear program. Then there's another angle where China would *hate hate hate* for SK and Japan to be nuclear states. So... China, we're not threatening you, we're just saying that's what may happen if the NK nuclear program keeps advancing... are you *sure* you don't want to do a little more to help with NK?
reddit Cross-Cultural 1501550654.0 ♥ 4
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitygovernment
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policynone
Emotionfear
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_dl036d7","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_dkzre7x","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_dkzpzqx","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"rdc_dl0mnty","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_dl00z4j","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"} ]