Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Recently, I heard that China was using AI responsibly, something that the US is …
ytc_UgzdP_sDG…
G
Schools don't teach how credit works or that if you take loads of cocaine you ca…
ytc_UgzmtR9hT…
G
Good presentation. I'm an ethicist but I also need to AI expert in this area. H…
ytc_Ugx_i0RUN…
G
I don't understand the double standard with regards to music vs art either. it's…
ytc_Ugz62_uwt…
G
I’m less afraid of Ai than I am of the significant amount of people that will bu…
ytc_UgwazE07m…
G
We treat our parents well largely because we wish our own children (and those of…
ytr_UgzkNqEKc…
G
I agree that AI is a big threat, but it's not nearly as far along as this guy th…
ytc_UgzNTOwUU…
G
To an extent it's... Still fucking cringe, actually.
You can generate an AI imag…
ytr_Ugwpn5vnl…
Comment
I don't think the author really understands what evolution is. First of all, he keeps referring to evolution as happening on the individual or organnismal level. It does not. Evolution happens at a population level. For this very reason, the argument he makes is inherently flawed. On the one hand, many evolutionary biologists agree, including myself, that consciousness could possibly be explained as a simple emergent phenomenon that comes from increasing brain complexity. However, the author is implying that the selective pressure is on consciousness itself rather than the actual neural networks that make up the brains of animals that exhibit it. In other words, there is a fitness advantage to reacting quickly to certain stimuli, making correct foraging decisions, having well timed and precise mating displays, making correct mate selection decisions, having efficient physiological systems, etc. These behaviors and processes are under the control of neuronal networks that are themselves under selective pressures, and when you smash enough of these networks into the same brain, an emergent phenomenon is generated which we call 'consciousness'. For this reason, I disagree with the author's entire idea as it is currently worded.
I will go further and say that this can be a problem with philosophy in general, and armchair philosophy specifically. Any evolutionary biologist would immediately see the same problems as I do, and yet from reading the comments it seems most people are 100% on board with this idea, mostly due to a lack of scientific understanding. Philosophers have long speculated on the nature of consciousness and since the scientific revolution have always been one or two steps behind the people actually studying it.
reddit
AI Moral Status
1499647203.0
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_dk08vui","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_djzewi9","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_djzhkak","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_djzhnps","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_djzgptf","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}
]