Raw LLM Responses

>Here, proponents of an evolution-informed morality make a leap that aligns the genetic perspective with the moral perspective Can you give an example of someone who argues this? Most prominent evolution writers like Dawkins explicitly say we should *not* look to evolution for what is moral. Sure, empathy, compassion, cooperation, reciprocal altruism etc (on which our morality is based) have their *roots* in evolution, since these traits were evolutionary adaptive. But these aren't held to be moral **because** of their roots in evolution. Evolution is also the source of racism and many other cognitive biases. Our capacity for abstract thought and culture allow us to move beyond mere instinct, beyond what evolution alone gave us. >To say that the goal of morality should be related to evolutionary concerns Are they saying *should*, or merely saying that the instincts on which our morality is based (compassion, empathy, cooperation, reciprocal altruism etc) have evolutionary roots? These traits are present in some other animals as well, because they are adaptive. We don't venerate every impulse bestowed upon us by evolution, but that doesn't mean our moral impulses have no evolutionary roots. I'd like an actual example of someone arguing the position that you're trying to refute here. I've read a bit about the evolution of morality, from Dawkins' Selfish Gene forward, and I've never encountered the argument you're addressing.