Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
They ignored sales... They measured memory and attitude, but neglected to measure the effect on sales. No one cares if the ad is forgotten or viewed negatively, as long as they get your money. The claim is "sex sells", not "sex makes you remembered for a long time with a positive attitude". They made a point at the end to mention that Carl's Jr. no longer uses sexy ads to sell burgers. **The CEO (Andy Puzder) claimed it saved the brand.** It's basically the worst example you can cite to prove the "sex doesn't sell" claim. Their new campaign, under a new CEO targetting a different demographic, still features tons of sex, but in a mocking fashion, so it's not exactly like they pulled away, they just refined the delivery of the sex.
reddit AI Bias 1498238460.0 ♥ 40
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:13:13.233606
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_dhdoofd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"rdc_dhdvmb9","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_djazhih","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_djr0vhu","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_djr1m08","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"} ]