Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
Is it really that surprising when the ratings are measured "per capita" so higher population = less emissions per person? India & China are fairly well known to be densly populated. Australia has a low population density yet still competes on global markets. Australia is responsible for a tiny percentage of the worlds emissions (1%) but has a high ratio per person because of its low population density. Australia is also an export/mining country so our main industries cause emissions, in order to rank highly on those emissions ratings, we would need to gut our industry and this would only reduce global emissions by a fraction of a percent. [Look at the graphs on the left](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c8/Co2-2013-top40.svg/680px-Co2-2013-top40.svg.png)
reddit Cross-Cultural 1479375085.0 ♥ 46
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningutilitarian
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_da436qh","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_da4588z","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_da3yazk","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_da40cmf","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"rdc_da3zswu","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"} ]