Raw LLM Responses

>Money is something invented by man because of the need for labor, Yeah, more or less. Some things aren't products of strictly labor though. Liiiiiike, old cheese or wine, or objects of historical significance. They gain value through time. No amount of labor can recreate it. Like, the Pyramids. You COULD build some pyramids in Cairo, Iowa, but it wouldn't have the same value as the original. >nature has always been free. HA! No! Indeed most of human history has involved people claiming portions of nature and not letting anyone else use it. Territory, and the basis of property. >I challenge anyone to think of a single reason why someone would need money in a world with robot labor. Admission to Disney world. Go read [Down and out in the magical kingdom](http://craphound.com/category/down/). It's a post-scarcity sci-fi. Even if there are resourses for everyone and death has been defeated, there are still the have and the have nots. Not everyone can live in the original Disneyland. It's a scarce resource, fundamentally. Also, ROBOT LABOR is not the same thing as a post-scarcity world. Hell, we're practically in a robot labor era now. Combines and factories do most of the work. The rest is marginal or knowledge work. >All resources could be owned as a community. You want to build a house? Let the city's building machines come build you whatever you want with renewable resources totally free ok. So they build my house this week, and a neighbors house next week. ...What if I want a house twice as big? Something that would take 2 weeks to build? And... presumably... we all decided to divvy up and share the land a nice and friendly like. What if I want a big skyrise in my square which blocks his view of the mountains? What if he's pissed about that?