Raw LLM Responses

No, I think the PoE conflates two different concepts of good that are related but distinct (and sometime's directly at odds). For argument's sake I will pretend I am a believer in a tri-omni God. In the absence of direct divine interaction, we are left with the measly human version of morality. It is subjective, but still has grounding from a number of sources: tradition, biological compassion, game theory, etc. On the other hand, there is God's version of good, which might overlap with the human good in many situations (or might not). God's version of the good might be tautological (i.e. good because God said so) or might be defined external to God in some frame of reference that we have no access to. So in this framework, for any action, if God has directly stated whether it is good or bad, that's what it is, but barring such a direct ruling, human morality applies. On a separate note, I would say many religious people would argue that we are made in God's image, meaning that our morality is just an imperfect version of God's morality. I don't think it changes my argument, but actually would give more epistemic weight to our human morality (assuming again that God exists). For the record, I am not defending the position, but if you walk into the discussion believing in a tri-omni God, I don't think the PoE is a powerful argument to lead you to contradiction.