Raw LLM Responses

Interesting thought experiment! While reading this, though, I wondered: wouldn't a more reasonable version of this "survival lottery" be one where one of the persons in need of a transplant is sacrificed to provide the necessary organ to the other? After all, the net loss/gain of life would end up being the same as in the original case, and a few of the objections can be mitigated or avoided outright: - wouldn't cause a population bias toward older people - the average person would have no need to fear a random death; in order to be subject to this version of the lottery, one would have to already be dying, so the chance of survival in fact truly remains the same or increases for *everyone* - no need for advanced algorithms to randomly select victims from general population - no need to worry that one is allowing people with unhealthy lifestyles to cheat death -- in the original case, who would accurately decide whether one has "brought misfortune onto oneself"?