Raw LLM Responses

I have a Ukrainian legal process question. The Ukrainian parliament (Rada) just passed [a bill condemning the human rights violations and demanding the executive curtail the police activities against protesters](http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=49810). They did three roll call votes, getting 238, 233, and 236 votes on each try. Note that a majority in the Rada is 226. This is good, but a bill passed in parliament isn't yet law. To pass in parliament requires 226 votes (which it got), then the Speaker's signature (which it got), then the President has a choice. He can either sign the bill into law, or: > The President of Ukraine may refuse to sign a bill and return it to Parliament with his proposals. If the parliament agrees on his proposals, the President must sign the bill. Parliament may overturn a veto by a two-thirds majority. If Parliament overturns his veto, the President must sign the bill within 10 days. Now obviously Yanukovich's proposals are going to be incompatible with what what the majority in the Rada (and the protest movement) wants. My question at this point is: **How likely is it that the majority in the Rada can gather a 2/3 super-majority (~298-299 votes) to overturn Yanukovich's veto?** If not, then the only way forward is outside the legal process (in this situation it is very plausible, considering so much of what has gone on on both sides has been technically illegal up to this point), and Yanukovich has the constitutional fig leaf of legitimacy until that time. But if the majority in the Rada can come up with ~298-299 votes and presumably the Speaker signs it, if I understand, Yanukovich **has to** sign it and/or abide by it. And the constitution gives him 10 days to do that (although I'm not sure of the purpose of those 10 days if he has only one option, unless the Speaker or super-majority can withdraw the bill). Does anyone know how that process is going forward?