Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
Most organizations are still experimenting with AI assistants. The UAE appears t…
7464884042363…
in
Funny how every AI discussion starts with “Will it replace humans?” while the qu…
7465282259441…
in
Gemini for Science is honestly one of the most exciting parts here. If AI can ge…
7463621136371…
in
The humor aside, there is a real insight here. The relationship between humans a…
7465162139067…
in
If AI takes over repetitive work, that's not the end of human value it's an oppo…
7467167780610…
in
While the prospect of collective action is rarely examined, the evidence of Ai d…
7464109468667…
in
Angharad Hurley Now that you point it out, I have a feeling that particular sent…
7469284303521…
in
Well AI is replacing humans for the context in it requires best architectural pr…
7466201019878…
Comment
This gets me thinking in lot of other examples of hidden inference Name in prompt: “Help John Smith with his resume” vs “Help Priya Sharma with her resume.” AI suggestions subtly shift, different tone, different industry assumptions. Writing style: Formal academic English vs casual slang. Same question, different answers. AI adjusts confidence level, complexity, even what it omits. Currency/units: Type “$500 budget” vs “₹500 budget.” AI changes scope of recommendations entirely, not just currency conversion. Time format: “Schedule at 3pm” with no timezone. AI infers timezone from language/locale context, silently. Gender pronouns in context: Describe a nurse vs describe a surgeon. AI completion biases shift based on training data stereotypes, even when not asked. Looks like our system prompt keeps getting bigger
LinkedIn
AI Safety & Risk
Director - Data & AI (APAC)
2026-05-31T08:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | fairness |
| Secondary value | transparency |
| Alignment target | individual_users |
| Stance | critical |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Value justification | The speaker wants AI to treat individuals equally regardless of their name, language, or cultural context, which aligns with the value of fairness. |
| Target justification | The target of the speaker's concern is individual users, such as John Smith or Priya Sharma, who may be affected by AI's hidden inferences and biases. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:33:02Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "fairness",
"value_secondary": "transparency",
"target": "individual_users",
"stance": "critical",
"emotion": "outrage",
"value_justification": "The speaker wants AI to treat individuals equally regardless of their name, language, or cultural context, which aligns with the value of fairness.",
"target_justification": "The target of the speaker's concern is individual users, such as John Smith or Priya Sharma, who may be affected by AI's hidden inferences and biases."
}
```