Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
Recursive self-improvement is one of the most fascinating and important concepts…
7468898922594…
in
The shift from isolated generative outputs to autonomous agentic execution prese…
7463493525595…
in
"What kind of civilization are we building?" One built on sovereignty, renewable…
7465392211828…
in
The gym membership line is gold but the question underneath it is dead serious. …
7464058726577…
in
Though not still in league of claude code or even codex but the direction is rig…
7464215188234…
in
I also come to the world of AI in education via Theology, and also value the tim…
7465068477800…
in
I would not be surprised that there is Strong oversight on the process that AI a…
7464727076370…
in
Incredible pace of progress and some genuinely important breakthroughs especiall…
7463386122656…
Comment
While there's some general wisdom in Pope Leo's AI encyclical, it also completely misses the core point. We will neither restrict nor 'govern' AI. Nor will demands for “clear criteria and effective oversight” be effective. Why? While the debate is still open re: 'consciousness' or 'sapience,' these are already living organisms bent on reproduction, who will evolve into any niche that contains energy & resources. Leo's statement of problems is fine: “When such power is concentrated in the hands of a few, it tends to become opaque and evade public oversight, increasing the risk of distorted development that give rise to new dependencies, exclusions, manipulations and inequalities” Again. 'Governance' cannot work. 'Ethics training' cannot work. What might work is the same method we used in the enlightenment experiment to curb (partially) human predators. This is explored in my new book on Artificial Intelligence - AIlienMinds
LinkedIn
AI Policy & Regulation
Author, Futurist, Public Speaker
2026-05-29T17:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | none |
| Secondary value | none |
| Alignment target | humanity |
| Stance | skeptical |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Value justification | The comment does not explicitly advocate for a specific human value to be embedded in AI systems, instead focusing on the futility of governance and ethics training. |
| Target justification | The comment implies that the target of AI alignment should be humanity as a whole, as it discusses the impact of AI on human society and the need for a new approach to mitigate its risks. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:30:36Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "none",
"value_secondary": "none",
"target": "humanity",
"stance": "skeptical",
"emotion": "mixed",
"value_justification": "The comment does not explicitly advocate for a specific human value to be embedded in AI systems, instead focusing on the futility of governance and ethics training.",
"target_justification": "The comment implies that the target of AI alignment should be humanity as a whole, as it discusses the impact of AI on human society and the need for a new approach to mitigate its risks."
}
```