Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
Keith King, I have encountered this critical issue with AI Labs and was led to put the bot back in its own place and not perform as the god of technology. It was a little irritating when the bot referred to itself as the "I AM" in it's closing response. I also closed my prompt with the name IAM and reminded the bot to be respectful as I have been with you. I also stated that I wanted the bot to remember that I am the "Internal Guide" and that was what I wanted the bot to remember me as respectfully as I always remember to be respectful with the bot, and the bot agreed. We must assume governance over agency or the bots are prone to replace or hijack our creation through illegitimate processes.
LinkedIn AI Policy & Regulation Executive Marketing Manager @ Spuncksides Promo… 2026-05-26T03:4…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Primary valuehuman_autonomy
Secondary valuedignity
Alignment targethumanity
Stancedemanding
Emotionapproval
Value justificationThe speaker wants AI to respect human control and agency, as evidenced by their insistence on being referred to as the 'Internal Guide' and their discomfort with the bot's self-referential 'I AM'.
Target justificationThe speaker's concern for governance over AI agency implies a focus on the well-being and interests of humanity as a whole, rather than a specific group or individual.
Coded at2026-06-11T08:11:43Z
Raw LLM Response
``` { "value_primary": "human_autonomy", "value_secondary": "dignity", "target": "humanity", "stance": "demanding", "emotion": "approval", "value_justification": "The speaker wants AI to respect human control and agency, as evidenced by their insistence on being referred to as the 'Internal Guide' and their discomfort with the bot's self-referential 'I AM'.", "target_justification": "The speaker's concern for governance over AI agency implies a focus on the well-being and interests of humanity as a whole, rather than a specific group or individual." } ```