Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

in Your point about token based pricing turning AI into a costly tool highlights wh… 7465425265876… in The distinction between AI that supports learning and AI that removes the fricti… 7464584841376… in Sure, and when I use it to have sophisticated language discussions and to reflec… 7464544677707… in Concerns like this are why some push against adoption altogether. But it's becom… 7465250612612… in My Perspective on AI’s Energy Footprint The issue is not a single AI query—it’s … 7466229828321… in Interesting reality check. The conversation should move from “AI replacing human… 7467202844102… in Something about the way AI never says "actually, on reflection" makes the humans… 7467785303685… in The AI debate keeps getting stuck at the surface level: “good or bad” “ethical o… 7465183341848…

Comment

From my understanding, AI should not replace people, rather it should free up people to do what they do best: solving the world's unique problems and exercising the freedom to innovate. I appreciate Olah's honesty. However, in my opinion, handing over AI governance to governments have the potential to do more harm than good. If any government turns against its own people, this technology can destroy humanity resulting in the manipulation of information and distortion of facts in global proportions. For me, the best option is to let the markets handle it. Like Healthcare systems who have Compliance and Cybersecurity governance to set up frameworks to safeguard patient information, enterprises who operate AI labs should have similar governance standards that keep innovation within bounds. It's not perfect but I prefer this option over trusting governments with governing information to this degree. Olah's right, people shouldn't be trusted. Much more so with governments, just saying.

LinkedIn AI Safety & Risk Innovation Leader | Driving Enterprise Strategy… 2026-05-25T19:4…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Primary value	human_autonomy
Secondary value	none
Alignment target	humanity
Stance	skeptical
Emotion	fear
Value justification	The speaker wants AI to augment human capabilities and free people to solve unique problems, rather than replacing them, which aligns with the value of human autonomy.
Target justification	The speaker expresses concern about the potential consequences of AI governance on humanity as a whole, indicating that their primary target is the well-being of humanity.
Coded at	2026-06-11T08:09:35Z

Raw LLM Response

```
{
  "value_primary": "human_autonomy",
  "value_secondary": "none",
  "target": "humanity",
  "stance": "skeptical",
  "emotion": "fear",
  "value_justification": "The speaker wants AI to augment human capabilities and free people to solve unique problems, rather than replacing them, which aligns with the value of human autonomy.",
  "target_justification": "The speaker expresses concern about the potential consequences of AI governance on humanity as a whole, indicating that their primary target is the well-being of humanity."
}
```

Raw LLM Responses