Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
Thank you for sharing this Pascal BORNET. This is where the control question bec…
7465391386796…
in
Great observation and analysis! That is why it's so important to ground any AI M…
7466776735821…
in
AI from ChinaTM, right!When dependence becomes a strategic risk, self-reliance t…
7463584807743…
in
AI value increasingly depends on how seamlessly capabilities connect across the …
7466842137150…
in
Amanda Kasmira Brown, I am glad this encyclical helps endorse all those who work…
7466137998410…
in
Assessment shapes behaviour. Change the assessment, change the behaviour. When g…
7464220733544…
in
Thought-provoking perspective on the future of work. The real challenge isn’t ju…
7468020806074…
in
I agree. Most students are not trying to break the rules, they are trying to nav…
7466111267821…
Comment
The deeper issue for me is that there is still a long distance between an LLM and a reliably deployable worker-like system, so I would be careful with any clean narrative about AI simply "doing most of the work". The more plausible near-term path is narrower: specialized systems supporting bounded and repetitive tasks, while shifting a great deal of effort into verification, integration, exception handling, and governance. In many cases the work does not disappear. It moves. And that is before the larger complexity problem even begins. Economic roles, institutional structures, incentives, and social expectations do not reconfigure in straight lines. They interact, adapt, and generate second- and third-order effects that are hard to model in advance. So I agree with the importance of the question, but I think we should be careful with simplified futures. If greater prosperity is possible, that would be an extraordinary gain. But getting there requires much deeper thinking than the current wave of hype, fear, or linear extrapolation usually allows.
LinkedIn
AI Safety & Risk
Independent Systems Architect | Driving Aligned…
2026-05-23T11:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | beneficence |
| Secondary value | none |
| Alignment target | humanity |
| Stance | skeptical |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Value justification | The speaker wants AI to be designed to make humans more capable and contribute to greater prosperity, which aligns with the value of beneficence. |
| Target justification | The speaker is concerned with the impact of AI on humanity as a whole, including economic roles, institutional structures, and social expectations, indicating a focus on the well-being of humanity. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:01:33Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "beneficence",
"value_secondary": "none",
"target": "humanity",
"stance": "skeptical",
"emotion": "indifference",
"value_justification": "The speaker wants AI to be designed to make humans more capable and contribute to greater prosperity, which aligns with the value of beneficence.",
"target_justification": "The speaker is concerned with the impact of AI on humanity as a whole, including economic roles, institutional structures, and social expectations, indicating a focus on the well-being of humanity."
}
```