Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
This is exactly why AI won’t replace human judgment anytime soon. It can process…
7467829865434…
in
Yes, students can now use AI to generate essays without deeply reading books, bu…
7464544750688…
in
The most interesting shift is not AI replacing expertise, but expanding what exp…
7466234347411…
in
To your question, Matthew Kilkenny: As with all transformative technologies, we …
7466788654812…
in
Correct, but it misses also a huge part of the problem.The ripples, the side eff…
7464952935957…
in
Fascinating glimpse into AI's accelerating capabilities and the crucial need for…
7468678138588…
in
Prashant K. Sahni Honestly one of the sharper takes in this thread. AI did not c…
7465011288415…
in
Great to see the focus on transparency and security, especially with the SynthID…
7465271764185…
Comment
There can’t be anything more demoralising to a lecturer than marking work you can clearly see is AI-generated but it can’t be conclusively proved by available integrity software. How is it even possible to allocate a fair mark in those circumstances, especially when there is a clear disjoint between the standard of the student’s usual performance in class and the standard of the dissertation submitted. A possible solution is to call for an oral defence of the work.
LinkedIn
AI Research & Models
Doctor of Laws, Practising Attorney (Commercial…
2026-05-23T11:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | fairness |
| Secondary value | accountability |
| Alignment target | individual_users |
| Stance | demanding |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Value justification | The speaker wants AI-generated work to be identifiable and fairly marked, implying a desire for fairness in assessment. |
| Target justification | The target of the speaker's concern is the individual student, whose usual performance in class may not reflect the standard of their submitted dissertation. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:01:24Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "fairness",
"value_secondary": "accountability",
"target": "individual_users",
"stance": "demanding",
"emotion": "outrage",
"value_justification": "The speaker wants AI-generated work to be identifiable and fairly marked, implying a desire for fairness in assessment.",
"target_justification": "The target of the speaker's concern is the individual student, whose usual performance in class may not reflect the standard of their submitted dissertation."
}
```