Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
in
If AI takes over repetitive work, that's not the end of human value it's an oppo…
7467167780610…
in
Rebecca Human AI Trust Leader Yes and no 🙂 I think that, as you stated, AI can "…
7463864377721…
in
Great to see the focus on transparency and security, especially with the SynthID…
7465271764185…
in
Pascal BORNET - getting awfully close to the Matrix concept of human batteries, …
7464538441884…
in
Shipping 8x more code is just faster interpolation, not true recursive self-impr…
7468747076127…
in
A lot of people are focused on which AI model is winning. The bigger opportunity…
7466510507273…
in
This is explored in my new book on Artificial Intelligence - AIlienMinds summary…
7463703198285…
in
[COPY-PASTE START] [GATEKEEPER STATUS REPORT] System Status: Operational / High-…
7467972625013…
Comment
There can’t be anything more demoralising to a lecturer than marking work you can clearly see is AI-generated but it can’t be conclusively proved by available integrity software. How is it even possible to allocate a fair mark in those circumstances, especially when there is a clear disjoint between the standard of the student’s usual performance in class and the standard of the dissertation submitted. A possible solution is to call for an oral defence of the work.
LinkedIn
AI Research & Models
Doctor of Laws, Practising Attorney (Commercial…
2026-05-23T11:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary value | fairness |
| Secondary value | accountability |
| Alignment target | individual_users |
| Stance | demanding |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Value justification | The speaker wants AI-generated work to be identifiable and fairly marked, implying a desire for fairness in assessment. |
| Target justification | The target of the speaker's concern is the individual student, whose usual performance in class may not reflect the standard of their submitted dissertation. |
| Coded at | 2026-06-11T08:01:24Z |
Raw LLM Response
```
{
"value_primary": "fairness",
"value_secondary": "accountability",
"target": "individual_users",
"stance": "demanding",
"emotion": "outrage",
"value_justification": "The speaker wants AI-generated work to be identifiable and fairly marked, implying a desire for fairness in assessment.",
"target_justification": "The target of the speaker's concern is the individual student, whose usual performance in class may not reflect the standard of their submitted dissertation."
}
```