Browse Comments

The scariest part isn’t that AI will take jobs, it’s that it will take away the illusion that humans were ever needed in the first place. Selwyn Raithe wrote in his best book that the real collapse wouldn’t come when machines replace us, but when we start to realize how replaceable we always were. That’s when society cracks. And it seems like it is coming really fast

I know we have a long way to go in tackling this disease, but we shouldn’t take for granted the advancements in medicine that make stuff like this possible in weeks rather than years

I love how Ethan takes this big issue on AI art and just flips it on its head with an anime “it’s the friends we made along the way” type of solution.

AI isn't there yet. Most companies just saw it as an excuse to cut jobs and boost short time profits with long time pains.

And then AI art portraying a couple mechanically unable to make eye contact. It’s not that they are timidly avoiding it, that would be an artistic decision. In this case there is absolutely no connection through their facial expressions.

You just proved Chatgpt is not conscious. No conscious being would put up with that kind of questioning without getting frustrated.

ABC should change their Sunday show to "Jesus Christ this fucking week with George Stephanopoulos".

lmao using chatgpt to criticise.. chatgpt it was all bound to happen anyways. they are not safe from enshittification, which is why open source is the way.

You managed to put into words why I don't like using "AI art looks bad" as an argument. I'll never use AI to draw or write for me, because I know I'll lose a part of myself if I come to rely on it.

She is so right. Two of the most influential communication platforms are created by people with emotional intelligence of cardboard. No wonder today’s society is so dysfunctional.

Calling yourself an AI "artist" is like heating up resturant leftovers in the microwave and thinking youre a chef.

I'm a medical student and one day the residents and I used ChatGPT for fun. I cannot even articulate how bad it is at medicine. So many random diagnoses and blatant wrong information. I'm not surprised the same is true for law

Claiming credit for -AI- -art- algorithmic image generation is like asking some one to commission art for you and claiming you made it.

As a computer engieener with a deep love of law, it drives me crazy that they even tried to do this. ChatGPT does not give you facts, it gives you fact shapped sentences. Chatgpt does not fact check, it only checks that the generated text has gramatical sense

I work at a national lab. The new Secretary of Energy visited recently and kept repeating “AI is Manhattan Project 2.0”. He intended for this to be a rallying cry to get us excited, but it ended up putting the fear of god in me.

these are actually the emotions polygon feels every day but he's just pretending like they're generated by ai

You also forgot that artist don't consent for their art to be used in ai training mechanisms and sometimes those mechanisms even sell products and stuff.

Okay, so do AIBros not realize how cartoonishly evil they sound when they talk about stealing people's art and how there's nothing you can do to protect it because their ego knows no bounds? I can't be convinced they 100% know it's wrong and don't care. "Defending AI art" is usually just hating on real artists who did the mysterious and foreign thing called putting in effort. "She's SO arrogant f…

As a Machine Learning Engineer, seeing Devin explain Chatbots better than 99% of the people in the world who think it's magic or something made me tear up

My 15 year old son was hell bent this past year on NOT using Chatgpt like his older brother and all his peers. He did his assignments “old school,” and guess what?! He got the lowest marks (was always in the high 80% prior) he’s ever received. When I saw his marks I was upset. He said, “it’s because I don’t use ChatGPT and everyone else does!!!” Ooooo man. I NEVER see this point touched upon but …