Browse Comments

2001 Space Odyssey warned us of the dangers of artificial intelligence, but we didn't listen.

In 2014 m usk said full self driving will be available next year, almost every year since he has made this claim

Current AI is not 'Artificial Intelligence'. It vomits words out and is very often either incorrect or making things up. Use it for just a little while on a subject you are familiar with and you will see the faults come out quickly.

That's real.. I noticed many students use ai for their studies and that's not actually good.. Where they used to type their application their ownn.. Now they're dependent on ai

8:57 " ChatGPT is deeply deeply biased along the racial line" That means it's deeply deeply RACIST

I’m actually glad he made this video so people see how unreliable even the most conservative Tesla autopilot can be - there’s definitely people out there relying far too much on Tesla autopilot so thank you for making this video Mark 🔥

He literally said, "only thing that can stop a bad guy with AI, is a good guy with AI"

While I appreciate Dr. Yampolskiy's urgency, I think it's important to separate plausible risks from hyperbole. Yes, AI is transforming industries—but predicting only five jobs left by 2030 feels more like provocation than prediction. Let’s focus on preparing people, not panicking them.

My experience of working in the industry is that people still can't write good specs-at least for "applications" that they want. I'm not talking about "take this number and shift it left" or whatever, but for high level apps, people always miss out what to them is obvious, but which they don't realise is specialised domain specific knowledge. So the functionality isn't as expected but they are …

2:44 "someone had to be first" just really shows the ai bro mindset of REALLY wanting to be some kind of trailblazer, but they cant comprehend that actually requires skills and a mediuk where you yourself cant make something unique in. Ai is putting words into an engine, and most of these ai bro cant even do this shit

We don't know what constitute human consciousness, how the hell can we be sure then if given llm is conscious or not?

His closing statement was crazy! In essence, that all AI wants is for us to ask permission from it before any work / experimentation.

It's a coincidence that he exposed chatgpt breaking copyright laws 3 months ago before he died #AreestSamaltman

"It seems empathetic but its not" not just a problem of AI, but also of bad humans.

"95% of Gen AI pilots fail" is such a brutal stat, but not surprising. The fragmentation is the real killer. You need one tool for video, one for voice, one for text... it's a logistic nightmare. I solved my own personal "pilot failure" by consolidating to omnely. Having Sora, Kling, Wan, and Nano Banana all in one dashboard makes it actually possible to build a workflow without drowning in subsc…

I bet its a very likely outcome is that strikers get practically everything they want... Except for anything about AI. They can afford short-term losses, but AI's impact is way too big to give it up to one strike. It would take several at least.

My art can be bad but im not going to be replaced by an A.I making arts.

i prefer using github copilot free, also uses gpt-4 or claude 3.5 and can do more things based on current files

Remember: even if AI art gets to a point where it can generate something that doesn’t look like ass it still will not be good. Art is not impressive because of the fidelity of the image, it’s impressive because it shows what humans are capable of

30:10 "Because (Sam) Altman loved the idea of adding zeroes to things" 😆I love this interviewee