Browse Comments

The thing most people seem to miss with the talk of A.I. is the fact that the people with expertise will be the most adept at using these tools when these tools add more control. I can show you two pieces of art and you can tell me which one took more expertise to make, but if you know very little about drawing you can't tell me why the better drawing is better. However, an artist can look at the…

After watching this, I think I need to point out that Toyota has had a level 2 autonomous system available since they put it in the Prius in 2010. The system is similar to the Highway Autopilot on Tesla. Toyota uses a radar array and cameras. The radar sees stuff like this and will slam on the brakes, and this is why Toyota is seldom if ever in the news for this kind of accident. The radar system…

So I work on machine learning stuff and have delved into NLP a bit. The way we train the models right now, it cannot be sentient. We are training them on prior data, like immense amounts of data. They essentially think of words as a list of numbers (oversimplified), and use that to generate text. You should start worrying when AI is trained via Reinforcement learning or some sort of continuous …

The fact that Clever AI Humanizer is free and still sounds this natural is actually insane.

I absolutely love the girl on Robot Hill drawing! The robots' eyes have money symbols, which suggests they value honor or money—they seem a bit greedy. And the girl being on them shows that AI can't stop her from creating art, which is really inspiring.

Now that pandora box has been open to fire the human imagination, the pace of A.I. development is very likely going to skyrocket over the coming decades, especially as it becomes more useful in society. Honestly, I don't think most of us are ready for the massive changes that could be on their way and in some ways, it's hard to figure out whether to be excited about all this or scared, I'm leani…

"Everyone should be impressed by how the AI can engage in these conversations. It's not just participating; it's learning from the debate and continuing to get smarter. People really need to recognize this!"

Let's make a job portal for AI, where companies can hire AI to create software. Please remember that AI must first submit their resume, which should pass through AI. xD

How about replacing the management layers with A.I. and letting the workers stay. Might be an improvement.

Call me when AI can deliver your baby. Or handle the trauma of an intrauterine fetal demise.

For some weird reason I think the journalist is the robot in this interview. She doesn’t ask follow up questions, it’s just prepared question and answer and the conversation feels so rehearsed and prepared. If you want to show off how advance the robot is, let them talk to a proper person who can ask follow up questions and prove properly not “cat or dog or republican or democrat. 😒

From a legal standpoint, it seems evident to me – and I say this as a lawyer with 35 years of experience in civil liability cases – that the company OpenAI can be held liable for the damages caused by its product. Especially since the product was trained with all sorts of information (including junk data from the internet) and no prior study of potential psychological harm was conducted before it…

Daniēls Sedliņš-Brūders If AI become advanced enough to say, ponder, think, create ideas, etc. Then at some point you won't have a choice, you'll have to give them rights.

It already is. I have no problem with AI art until a corporation starts to use it. Also AI generated hentai is trash

What the AI bros don't realize is that if creatives actually engaged in creating AI prompts the AI prompts would likely be way more creative then theirs. So then what? Create another AI to create prompts for AI based on the prompts the actually creative talent people made? Creativity and art is a skill, and there are no short cuts to getting good at a skill. Stop trying to get something else to d…

Bro I laughed so hard when the "AI rascistly" predicted Robert Mcdaniel was gonna get shot and they got shot twice 😂😭💀

This could be said for literally every human. It is extremely bad argument against AI. The person creating the fact can't be the one validating it. That's exactly why there is something called "peer reviewed" in academics.

I wanted to write something similar as a researcher working on AI, but yours response is what I imagined. Thanks

Not even that. Im an engineer that occasionally works with Machine learning. Unless you're using a chatbot whose model is specifically trained on legal documentation then you shouldn't trust it with literally any kind of technical question.

@llama6394 it should be, lol. There have been cases in which celebrities sue companies because they use their image without their consent and/or against their will 🤷🏼‍♀️ but idk, the internet has normalized trasspassing personal boundaries to an extent where people are just mere objects...