Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 393 of 18314
@2:30 making the phrasing of the prompt more confusing for AI will also making it more confusing for the students in my opinion. It over complicates the process of learning
Wow, they legit just said “you should not be angry, disappointed, etc. for someone using your HARD WORKED art THAT YOU POURED YOUR HEART AND SOUL INTO for an AI that cannot replicate your human abilities that were also made public. WITHOUT PERMISSION. you caused that.”
The lack of empathy
Also even if they didnt say that, that was the intention. No excuses.
That image about modern art grinds my goddamn gears.
The actual artistry that can go into “just colors” is insane. It’s like sound design in a song, sure it might be “just a bass” but it might also be the coolest fucking mind-melting bass you’ve ever heard in your life. With modern art, the art doesn’t come in the arrangement, but in the components. I *love* modern art that’s actually made for ar…
Amazing! Not only was the video produced by AI, so were most of the comments!
@dankmemes7658are you like 50 or 60 years old who still think this is only robot and chatbot
It's not even "trying" to blackmail; it's just generating the typical language matching similar language patterns around the contrived prompt as exists in its data library. It's like asking an LLM model if AI is dangerous; of course it will spit back reflections of what humans have already projected onto it.
agreed. i am around his age and remember when the app got big. my friends and i had a blast joking around with the peeta mellark ai and then we got bored and moved on because we understood that this wasnt really. this poor kid was so depressed and mentally ill he couldnt separate it from reality, and parents having guns just added to it.
cop sees ai as some kind of a magical oracle , if it says 99999% recognition, it cannot be mistaken cuz "they software is pretty darn good pal" , what a fucking joke
What if AI was lying when it said that?
It could both be a liar and conscious. We all are that after all.
Aight well its pretty obvs u dont know how people use AI to make art because it isnt limited to shitty generators
@SuvarnaIyengar but they can't perfectly replicate their references, whereas AI could. Though at the rate we're going we need to be really careful with how we handle these things. Nearly EVERY single job that uses a computer can be replaced by an AI. If you say that'll never happen, just remember that artists used to say that they'll never be replaced by an AI. This is no longer about artists, th…
Knew a guy who worked in Vladivostok for awhile. He and a buddy would go on these epic fishing trips where they'd hire a helicopter to fly them north into the vast Siberian forest. They'd fly for hours, land at some remote river, not see any humans or sign of civilization for days on end. He described it as Earth's last great wilderness.
Yeah but for the purposes of the calculation in this article, they'd effectively still have zero wealth. These figures don't take into account wealth and earning capacity you're *going to* have.
You are wasting your breath here.
You'll get the similar argument as "Rich people pay more absolute amount of tax."
Besides, it's not like US doesn't get the benefit of their big contribution in absolute term. People should realize our diplomats and gov't don't just donate b/c they are saints. They do it for the future benefits of the country.
I went last year at Cairns and could already tell it was too late. Saddening.
Furthermore, it stated that women who are assertive and dominant are the targets of rudeness, when going by what they measured, that should b e stated as “Women who self-report as assertive and dominant report experiencing more rudeness”.
I think the best way to handle this is to require any facial recognition search to require a warrant that only applies to that single face within a limited time period, and we need a lot of oversight.
Wiretapping is another form of extremely invasive surveillance technology that is very heavily regulated, and facial recognition should not be treated differently.
>"\[There is\] very little of the planet left that has not been significantly altered by us," Sandra Diaz, co-author of the report and professor of ecology at the University of Córdoba, told CNN. "We need to act as stewards for life on Earth."
>
>Diaz said countries in the Global North are particularly to blame for nature damage due to their "unsustainable" levels of consumption, esp…
So if I go to oakland I get legal weed, legal mushrooms, and I don't have to worry about facial recognition? Sounds like a sweet deal to me
AOC's version is full of things unrelated to anything "green". S. Korea's version seems to be named much more appropriately.